On the Possibility of a New Elite
This article was posted in early 2025 but seems to have disappeared from TOO. This is the version from The Occidental Quarterly with a few edits to bring it up to date.
I am perhaps best known for documenting a hostile, highly influential Jewish elite in the U.S. and really throughout the West. But I think things are changing in a good direction, with some important exceptions.
Jews ascended to the heights of American society in several stages. In the early twentieth century they were important enough to get Henry Ford’s attention. Ford noted their prominence in a variety of fields and their hostility to Christianity—see my discussion of Henry Ford’s The International Jew published from 1920 to 1922.[1] Jews also had prominent roles in FDR’s administrations,[2] but it wasn’t until after World War II that anti-Jewish attitudes basically disappeared and they really entered the mainstream. Jews then led the 1960s counter-cultural revolution and became a dominant elite in the 1960s, deeply involved in the passage of the 1965 immigration law that eventually radically transformed the country, as well as civil rights legislation and the general ascent of the left to a position of dominance in American culture.[3] Jewish ascendency was accompanied by the decline and eventual eclipse of the previously dominant WASP east-coast establishment.[4]
The main sources of Jewish power since the 1960s have been: 1.) their ownership of media and their creation of media content as writers and producers; 2) their wealth and willingness to contribute to political causes—funding political candidates and establishing nonprofit organizations and lobbying groups able to influence public policy; 3.) their domination of academic culture, ultimately due to their influence in elite universities and trickling down to lower-tier universities and eventually the K-12 educational system.
Is this Jewish power structure still in place? Yes, but there appear to be important changes indicating that Jewish power is not what it once was. Moreover, it’s hard to believe that the organized Jewish community is able to retain its position as paragons of tolerance and virtue in view of Israeli actions in Gaza and the support these actions have received by the American Jewish community.
MEDIA
When I was growing up in the 1950s, there were three television networks, all owned by Jews (ABC, CBS, NBC). These networks are still owned by Jews. The New York Times, often labeled “America’s newspaper of record,” is still owned by a Jewish family and reflects of the mainstream liberal-left Jewish community. However, the influence of these exemplars of the legacy media has declined dramatically.
If the 2024 election shows anything, it’s that the legacy mainstream media is distrusted more than ever and has been effectively replaced among wide swaths of voters, especially young voters, by alternative media, particularly podcasts and social media. Joe Rogan, a former liberal (wasn’t everyone?) has become increasingly conservative and Tucker Carlson has pushed the boundaries of conservative thinking, such as his interview with Darryl Cooper questioning the sacrosanct World War II narrative,[5] as well as his interview with Curt Mills that touches on neoconservatism—essentially a Jewish intellectual and political movement[6]—and America’s disastrous wars in the Middle East.[7] Another former liberal, Elon Musk, is gleefully taking a sledge hammer to the entrenched, overwhelmingly Democrat-leaning federal bureaucracy.
Just recently, Trump’s Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth evicted The New York Times, National Public Radio, NBC, and Politico from their Pentagon offices to make room for One America News Network, The New York Post, Breitbart News Network, and the Huffington Post (which did not ask for representation).[8] All of the ones replaced are decidedly on the left and replacements are conservative except Huffington Post. None can be considered legacy media.
Thomas Edsall in the New York Times has noted that “While both Democrats and Republicans have abandoned newspapers in growing numbers, … the drop among Republicans accelerated much faster than it did for Democrats in 2016, the year Trump first ran for president.”[9] Legacy newspapers are thus a key source of information for Democrats but not Republicans.
Conservative media is slavishly pro-Israel even as they typically oppose liberal-left domestic political policies favored by the mainstream Jewish community, such as:
- promoting high levels of legal non-White immigration, enabling illegal immigration, and stopping deporting illegals because they see them as future voters for the liberal left and diluting the power of White Americans;[10]
- promoting so-called hate speech laws and other attempts to rein in free speech on racial/ethnic issues, including especially criticisms of Israel;
- supporting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs and Critical Race Theory that discriminate against and foster hatred against Whites;[11]
- promoting transgenderism, gay rights, advocating easy access to abortion, etc.
Jews typically vote overwhelmingly Democrat and basically fund the Democratic Party. In the 2024 election they voted 71–79 percent for Harris, thus supporting the liberal-far left policies favored by the Harris campaign.[12] Even though there was some shift to more conservative voting among groups of Jews, they are still on the left when it comes to domestic issues.
Jewish neoconservatives were a long-time fixture in the GOP but defected with the rise of Trump because of his professed distaste for foreign wars and likely because of Trump’s stated views on immigration and multiculturalism. Predictably, the neocons seamlessly defected to the Democrats where their liberal-left views on domestic policy fit right in. While in the GOP, they moved the party to the left on social issues while promoting pro-Israel wars in the Middle East,[13] and they now the Ukraine war against Russia. Conservative media by and large support Trump,[14] and are thus anathema to most Jews. [However, in Trump”s second term, the neocon mentality has returned with a vengeance, leading to the disastrous war on Iran that may turn out to be an turning point in Middle East history and the end of American dreams of world hegemony. Neocons are furious about Trump’s proposed Memorandum of Understanding on Iran.]
The point being that even though conservative media is obsessively pro-Israel, it opposes the attitudes and policies of the mainstream liberal-left Jewish community on domestic policy. The legacy media, a main power base of the mainstream liberal-left Jewish community, appears to be in terminal decline.
The rise of alternative media is critical. Under Elon Musk, X is clearly open to conservative views, and indeed, when I go on there (rarely), all I see are conservative and even anti-Jewish posts (e.g., by Nick Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) and Ye (Kanye West), although Ye recently removed his account. X has become a rightleaning media outlet that attracts young people and many others who reject the legacy media—during the run-up to the 2024 election it was great entertainment to see the replies to posts by the Harris campaign.
FUNDING THE LEFT
What about funding the left? Jewish financial clout is certainly still in place, but we are seeing the rise of a very wealthy class of non-Jewish multi-millionaires and billionaires, prototypically Elon Musk (who reportedly gave Trump’s campaign more than $290 million[15]). Wealthy non-Jews are thus quite willing and able to finance a competitive campaign like Trump’s. As of August 14, 2024 according to Forbes, of 26 billionaire donors to Trump (not including Musk), 22 are not Jewish, while 4, including Bernard Marcus (who recently died) are Jewish, with only one in the top ten (pro-Israel fanatic Miriam Adelson—$100 million).[16] Overall, Democrats and Democrat-affiliated groups spent $1.8 billion, while Republicans and Republican-affiliated groups spent about $1.4 billion.[17] The Trump campaign certainly had enough money to run a credible campaign and even win despite the deluge of hate emanating from the legacy media.
Jewish money is thus not necessary to win, especially if the richest man in the world is on board. Assuming Musk gave $300 million, it’s far less than 1 percent of his wealth. Indeed, Musk could finance a presidential campaign all by himself—$2 billion would be more than even the Democrats and Democrat-affiliated groups spent on the 2024 presidential campaign, but Musk could easily afford that. As the Jews have known forever, money is power.
All this wealth supporting Trump 2.0 was apparent at Trump’s inauguration:
Here were America’s tech tycoons, members of his court, in a pantheon at his second Inaugural Address, directly across from the former presidents and in front of Trump’s presumptive cabinet. Many members of Congress, the actual elected government, were relegated to the cheaper seats.
The men who control Americans’ eyeballs and, often, emotions got the choicest seats; several have scarfed up big mansions in Washington to be closer to the Oval.
Elon Musk sat behind the vice president’s mother, pumping his arms and giving two thumbs-up when Trump said he’d put an American flag on Mars, where Musk wants to die (just not on impact).
Google’s Sundar Pichai was near Don Jr. and next to Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, who were near Ivanka and Jared. Shou Zi Chew, the TikTok C.E.O., sat next to Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s intended director of national intelligence. Tim Cook of Apple was close to Barron Trump. Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, was also at the inaugural but—perhaps because of his legal duel with Elon—was in the overflow room with Ron DeSantis, Eric Adams and Conor McGregor.[18]
Most of these tycoons are likely just trying to ingratiate themselves with the new administration, but this is a huge change from the 2017 inauguration and suggests that they are quite comfortable with the sea changes the Trump is pursuing.
ACADEMIA
And then there’s the university—definitely the hardest nut to crack because hiring is rigorously policed to make sure that new faculty and administrators are on the left. Academics who get out of line can expect a lifetime of harassment and hostility, and, if they don’t have tenure, they will certainly be fired even if their teaching and scholarship are excellent.
As in other areas, Jews ascended the heights of the academic world after World War II and especially during the 1960s.[19][20] Once they achieved prominence and always eager as a small minority to make alliances with other groups, they promoted the expansion of departments essentially composed of activists of the left, such as gender studies and various ethnic studies departments for Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Jews, etc., thus expanding the liberal arts faculty and creating a critical mass of leftist activists. This structure is still in place.
Since the Israeli war in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, there have been a great many protests on campus, but Jewish power has put a rather quick end to that:
The policies ranged from banning the erection of tents on campus grounds to limiting the times and places where students are allowed to hold demonstrations. While free speech experts agree that some time, place and manner restrictions are acceptable, they have branded some policy changes unconstitutional.[21]
At UCLA, pro-Israel thugs were allowed to run amok among protesters while the police stood by. Ron Unz:
Even worse scenes took place at UCLA as an encampment of peaceful protesters was violently attacked and beaten by a mob of pro-Israel thugs having no university connection but armed with bars, clubs, and fireworks, resulting in some serious injuries. A professor of History described her outrage as the nearby police stood aside and did nothing while UCLA students were attacked by outsiders, then arrested some 200 of the former.[22]
Obviously, these restrictions are a far cry from university responses to the BLM riots. As Unz noted,
I’d think that most of these students were absolutely stunned at such reactions. For decades, they and their predecessors had freely protested on a wide range of political causes without ever encountering even a sliver of such vicious retaliation, let alone an organized campaign that quickly forced the resignation of two of the Ivy League presidents who had allowed their protests. Some of their student organizations were immediately banned and the future careers of the protesters were harshly threatened, but the horrifying images from Gaza continued to reach their smartphones.
Jewish power in academia is alive and well.
The Trump administration is pushing back on the academic left but not against Jewish power in the universities, proposing to deport foreign students and professors involved in anti-Israel protests:
The new attorney general, Pam Bondi, created a task force to prosecute antisemitic acts, including on college campuses. The president’s order singles out last year’s university protests against Israel’s war in Gaza, which it says unleashed a barrage of discrimination against Jewish students. The order targets international students who participated in those protests with deportation.”[23]
There is also a welcome campaign to end Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs at universities. It’s long been apparent that the only way to rein in the radical left that dominates academia is to cut off their money. Although Department of Education ruling of February 17, 2025 fits with color-blind conservative ideology, it does mention discrimination against Whites (and Asians) and specifically targets Critical Race Theory which is nothing but anti-White hate. Thus far it has cancelled over $1.2 billion from university grants, noting that “Review of the contracts uncovered wasteful and ideologically driven spending not in the interest of students and taxpayers.”[24]
Trump’s attitude on foreign student protesters will put a further chill into what has already been happening with anti-Israel protests. But fighting DEI at universities will be an uphill struggle against an academic establishment that has devoted huge amounts of money and hired thousands of bureaucrats to administer DEI programs.[25] Moreover, universities will likely find ways to continue DEI programs even if they are legally prohibited, as they have with affirmative action admissions.[26]
However, of the three main sources of Jewish power, academic influence is least important. Students will notice that DEI jobs are drying up and that spouting and living the old leftist political clichés is not a good route to social and career success. Women in particular are likely to shift political preferences when they see a shift in the status hierarchy, but men will also change their attitudes as they try to advance in the new hierarchy.
CONCLUSION
There is a real possibility of the rise of an essentially non-Jewish elite centered outside the traditional legacy media and with the financial resources able to mount successful political campaigns and fund compatible NGOs. Whether this could develop into an anti-Jewish elite is a completely different question—unlikely for the foreseeable future because of the deep personal ties and business relationships among elite Jews and non-Jews. Nevertheless, as noted, the domestic policies of the Trump administration for the most part depart dramatically from policies long favored by the mainstream liberal-left Jewish community.
Already we see numerous Jewish organizations protesting any end to DEI or the deportations of illegal immigrants.[27],[28]
Although the present situation is in flux, it is quite possible that in the future the new elite described here could become far more than a possibility. This new elite may realize that Jewish support and Jewish power in American politics is not what it was and that there is no real need to support the policies favored by the mainstream Jewish community. Indeed, this may have already happened—with the important exception of pro-Israel attitudes that also appeal to some sections of the Republican base (e.g., knee-jerk support of Israel by mainstream conservatives and Evangelicals). Some parts of this new elite may be well aware of the role Jews have played in erecting the multicultural disaster that America has become—a position that was common on the American right for decades, at least from the time of Henry Ford until neoconservatives pushed out traditional conservatives during the Reagan administration and William Buckley purged the conservative movement of critics of Jewish influence.[29],[30] And they may be well aware that the slavish support that America has given Israel has been enormously costly in terms of lives and treasure without really serving American interests.
Musk is a good example:
Musk is increasingly off the reservation in his tweets: “The damage was done,” [holocaust activist] Deborah Lipstadt remarked about a Musk post on X.[31] “The endorsement of the Great Replacement theory was very harmful.” Lipstadt added that she disapproved of what she saw as any attempt to “mitigate” Musk’s earlier tweet, without criticizing ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt directly. “You can try to mitigate, but once you open the pillow, it’s like chasing the feathers,” she said.
Musk was replying to a user who wrote, “Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I’m deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest s— now about western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities [they] support flooding their country don’t exactly like them too much.”
Musk responded, “You have said the actual truth.”
Greenblatt joined a loud chorus in condemning that post. Other Jewish groups, including the American Jewish Committee, harshly condemned it. Later in the same thread, Musk went after the ADL itself, saying the group “push[es] de facto anti-white racism.” He apologized for a lot of this and made the mandatory visits to Auschwitz and Israel, but it’s hard to believe that he now rejects these ideas.[32]
Notice that the idea of the Great Replacement is completely off limits for Jewish activists like Lipstadt. They see any claim that the Great Replacement is real as an anti-Jewish conspiracy theory no matter what the changing demographics indicate and even without any mention of Jews—and no matter what research shows was the very prominent Jewish role in promoting the 1965 immigration law and their consistently promoting non-European immigration throughout the West.[33]
As always, I am an optimist. I think that a lot of the figures on the right are quite aware of the deleterious effects of Jewish power and influence on the formerly dominant White America. And as I noted, “it’s hard to believe that [Musk] now rejects these ideas.” He likely just knows better than to utter them in public.
And consider Vice-President J.D. Vance’s speech at a conference in Munich attended by powerful EU leaders and going against what has been a consensus among European elites:
And of all the pressing challenges that the nations represented here face, I believe there is nothing more urgent than mass migration. Today, almost one in five people living in this country [Germany] moved here from abroad. That is, of course, an all-time high. It’s a similar number, by the way, in the United States, also an all-time high. The number of immigrants who entered the EU from non-EU countries doubled between 2021 and 2022 alone. And of course, it’s gotten much higher since.
And we know the situation. It didn’t materialize in a vacuum. It’s the result of a series of conscious decisions made by politicians all over the continent, and others across the world, over the span of a decade. We saw the horrors wrought by these decisions yesterday in this very city [when an Afghan migrant rammed a car into a crowd, killing a woman and child]. And of course, I can’t bring it up again without thinking about the terrible victims who had a beautiful winter day in Munich ruined. Our thoughts and prayers are with them and will remain with them. But why did this happen in the first place?
It’s a terrible story, but it’s one we’ve heard way too many times in Europe, and unfortunately too many times in the United States as well. An asylum seeker, often a young man in his mid20s, already known to police, rams a car into a crowd and shatters a community. Unity. How many times must we suffer these appalling setbacks before we change course and take our shared civilization in a new direction? No voter on this continent went to the ballot box to open the floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants. But you know what they did vote for? In England, they voted for Brexit. And agree or disagree, they voted for it. And more and more all over Europe, they are voting for political leaders who promise to put an end to out-of-control migration. Now, I happen to agree with a lot of these concerns, but you don’t have to agree with me.
I just think that people care about their homes, they care about their dreams, they care about their safety and their capacity to provide for themselves and their children.
And they’re smart. I think this is one of the most important things I’ve learned in my brief time in politics. Contrary to what you might hear a couple of mountains over in Davos, the citizens of all of our nations don’t generally think of themselves as educated animals or as interchangeable cogs of a global economy. And it’s hardly surprising that they don’t want to be shuffled about or relentlessly ignored by their leaders. And it is the business of democracy to adjudicate these big questions at the ballot box.
I believe that dismissing people, dismissing their concerns or worse yet, shutting down media, shutting down elections or shutting people out of the political process protects nothing. In fact, it is the most surefire way to destroy democracy. Speaking up and expressing opinions isn’t election interference. Even when people express views outside your own country, and even when those people are very influential. And trust me, I say this with all humor—if American democracy can survive ten years of Greta Thunberg’s scolding you guys can survive a few months of Elon Musk.
But what no democracy—American, German or European—will survive, is telling millions of voters that their thoughts and concerns, their aspirations, their pleas for relief, are invalid or unworthy of even being considered.[34]
It’s great to see such ideas being articulated at the apex of political power in America.
We can take our country back.
[1] Kevin MacDonald, “Henry Ford and the Jewish Question,” The Occidental Quarterly 2, no. 4 (Winter 2002/2003): 53–77.
[2] See: Frederick Talmadge, “The Jews and the First New Deal, 1933–1934,” this issue of The Occidental Quarterly, 61–108.
[3] See: Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique (AuthorHouse, 2002; orig. pub.: Praeger, 1998), Ch. 3; Kevin MacDonald, “The Default Hypothesis Fails to Explain Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Quarterly 22, no. 2 (Fall, 2022): 3–52.
[4] Kevin MacDonald, “Eric Kaufmann’s The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America,” The Occidental Quarterly 15, no. 4 (Winter, 2015–2016): 3–42.
[5] Kevin MacDonald, “The Carleson-Cooper Podcast: A Major Step Forward,” The Occidental Observer (September 7, 2024). https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/09/07/the-carlson-cooper-podcast-a-major-step-forward/
[6] Kevin MacDonald, “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement,” The Occidental Quarterly 4, no. 2 (Summer, 2004): 7–74.
[7] Kevin MacDonald, “Tucker Interviews Curt Mills: Pushing the Envelope on Mainstream Conservative Foreign Policy,” The Occidental Observer (February 6, 2025). https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/02/06/tucker-interviews-curt-millspushing-the-envelop-on-mainstream-conservative-foreign-policy/
[8] Amanda Terkel, “Pentagon Removes Major Media Outlets, Including NBC News, in New ‘Rotation Program,’” NBC News (January 31, 2025). https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/pentagon-removes-major-media-outlets-nbc-news-dedicated-workstations-p-rcna190276
[9] Thomas B. Edsall, “The Right is Winning the Battle for Hearts and Minds, The New York Times (January 21, 2025). https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/21/opinion/trump-maga-hearts-minds.html
[10] A major motivation for Jewish activism in support of the 1965 immigration law was fear of the White majority turning on them, as happened in Germany, 1933–1945.
See: MacDonald, “The Default Hypothesis Fails to Explain Jewish Influence.”
[11] Ben Sales, “34 Liberal Jewish Groups Sign a Statement Defending DEI as an ‘Invaluable Tool’” (February 7, 2025). https://www.jta.org/2025/02/07/unitedstates/34-liberal-jewish-groups-sign-statement-defending-dei-as-an-invaluable-tool
[12] Kevin MacDonald, “Trump 2.0: Harbinger of a New Elite?,” The Occidental Observer (November 20, 2024). https://www.theoccidenta-
lobserver.net/2024/11/20/trump-2-0-harbinger-of-a-new-elite/
[13] MacDonald, “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement.”
[14] Stuart A. Thompson, “In the Eyes of Right-Wing Media, Trump Just Keeps On Winning,” New York Times (February 5, 2025). https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/technology/trump-media-right-wing.htm
[15] David Wright & Alex Leeds-Matthews, “Elon Musk Spent More than $290 Million on the 2024 Election, Year-End FEC Filings Show,” CNN (February 1, 2025). https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/elon-musk-spent-more-than-
290-million-on-the-2024-election-year-end-fec-filings-show/ar-AA1yf4CH
[16] Leo Kamin, “Here Are Trump’s Top Billionaire Donors,” Forbes (August 14, 2024). https://www.forbes.com/sites/leokamin/2024/08/14/here-are-trumps-topbillionaire-donors/
[17] Ben Kamisar, “The Final Price Tag on 2024 Political Advertising: Almost $11 Billion,” NBCNews (November 8, 2024). https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024election/final-price-tag-2024-political-advertising-almost-11-billion-rcna179341
[18] Maureen Dowd, “Trump Has Everyone Where He Wants Them,” The New York Times (January 20, 2025). https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/opinion/president-trump-inauguration.html
[19] Kevin MacDonald, “Why Are Professors Liberals?,” The Occidental Quarterly 10, no. 2 (Summer, 2010): 57–104. http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/LiberalProfessors-
[20] .pdf
[21] Johanna Alonso, “Massive Decline in Protests from Spring to Fall,” Inside Higher Ed (December 19, 2924). https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/freespeech/2024/12/19/2000-fewer-pro-palestinian-protests-fall-spring-2024
[22] Ron Unz, “Israel/Gaza: The Masks Come Off in American Society,” Unz Review (May 6, 2024). https://www.unz.com/runz/israel-gaza-the-masks-come-off-inamerican-society/
[23] Eric Westervelt, “Trump Executive Order Aims to Deport International Students Who Have Protested Israel,” National Public Radio (February 6, 2025). https://www.npr.org/2025/02/06/nx-s1-5281179/trump-executive-order-aims-todeport-international-students-who-have-protested-israel
[24] Ryan Quinn, “Education Department Cancels Another $350 Million in Contracts, Grants,” Inside Higher Ed (February 17, 2025). https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/2025/02/17/education-department-cancels-350mcontracts-grants
[25] Martha Bradley-Dorsey, “The Black Hole of DEI Spending at Public Universities,” Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology (July 21, 2021). https://www.cspicenter.com/p/the-black-hole-of-dei-spending-at-public-universities
[26] Jeremiah Poff, “How Universities Are Getting Around the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling,” Washington Examiner (September 25, 2924). https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/3164319/how-universities-getting-around-supreme-court-affirmative-action/
[27] Sales, “34 Liberal Jewish Groups Sign a Statement Defending DEI as an ‘Invaluable Tool.”
[28] Ben Sales, “Dozens of Jewish Groups Protest Trump’s Plans for Mass Deportation” (January 27, 2925). https://www.jta.org/2025/01/27/politics/dozens-of-jewish-groups-protest-trumps-plans-for-mass-deportation?
[29] MacDonald, “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement,” 16, 26.
[30] Spencer J. Quinn, “Punching Back Weakly: William F. Buckley’s In Search of Anti-Semitism, The Occidental Observer (November 8, 2022). https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/11/08/punching-back-weakly-william-f-buckleys-in-searchof-anti-semitism/
[31] Andrew Lapin, “Why ADL Chief Jonathan Greenblatt Is Praising Musk as Advertisers Flee X over Antisemitism,” Jewish Telegraph Agency (November 20, 2023). https://www.jta.org/2023/11/20/united-states/why-adl-chief-jonathan-greenblatt-is-praising-elon-musk-as-advertisers-flee-x-over-antisemitism
[32] Kevin MacDonald, “Why I Voted for Trump,” The Occidental Observer (November 1, 2024). https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/11/01/why-i-voted-fortrump/
[33] MacDonald, “The Default Hypothesis Fails to Explain Jewish Influence.”
[34] Christina Lu, “The Speech That Stunned Europe,” Foreign Policy (February 18, 2025). https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/18/vance-speech-munich-full-text-readtranscript-europe/
The only reason DEI was ended was it became painfully obvious it threatened the jews and Israel. That’s it. Nothing else could touch before that (~starting around 2021).That’s about when Zionism turned against US Academia.
Of course since the Realignment in jan 2025 most of the Right has been indirectly supporting Zionism – because they are “conservatives” and slow to realize anything much less respond effectively to it.
The above speech by Vance must be seen as Trump’s views. The non-Jew elites are a good sign that Jew Power has been weakened, most by Gaza and Iran War, and now that Trump is backtracking on war for TheJews. Macgregor just today or yesterday stated his fear that Trump could be assassinated by Israel. That seems unlikely in that constitutional successors would also have to killed or neutralized.
However, given the probability of Dem victories in the mid-term election and in ’28, the state of the GOP seems highly unpromising, from the point of view of anti-semites like us. I have been saying that the only thing that is going to change things dramatically in our favor is massive social, economic, political crisis, an outcome which will succeed in ushering in requisite chaos, per my above remark on Trump having another go at the war.
Having elite support for our side is a very good thing of course. And more war will strengthen anti-semitic feelings everywhere. Jews are scared right now so the big question is how much will Trump back them domestically, while he tries to contain Israel? Macgregor just said that Trump has courage.. presumably enough to outweigh his greed…and could come down hard on The Jews. He wants his fat face on Rushmore but he will not get it with more war/chaos for the world, unless he dominates Israel…potentially cutting off all military aid and even threatening military attack. Reminds me of JFK’s Profiles in Courage, the book. Could Trump bomb Israel?
I totally agree with your assessment: “…I have been saying that the only thing that is going to change things dramatically in our favor is massive social, economic, political crisis, an outcome which will succeed in ushering in requisite chaos, per my above remark on Trump having another go at the war.”
I too follow Col. Macgregor. Yes, he worries that Israel will murder Trump now that he seems to be turning against them. However, your assessment nails it again. Trump might be so “judged” under a true “People’s Court” for his self-admitted high crimes & treason. That justice would definitely be pronounced by a modern-day Judge Roland Freisler. Until such an environment manifests itself, Trump and his coterie of traitors will escape “Old-Fashioned Justice”– American OR German! Macgregor also warns about the evolving world-wide depression that is unfolding around us all. To which I say, BRING IT ON!
Thank you Joe!
Soviet Communism – they put it in 1917 and pulled it down by 1997.
Western Wokery – they started it around 1964 and opposed it by 2024.
Israel the pivotal factor.
thanks. just want to get the right date in for the Jew Power triumphalist Long-March to hegemonic cultural domination. It started with Franz Boas in 1920 and his conquest of Physical Anthropology over the next few decades with his jew army of the night gradually replacing the Whites who had kept the Universities jew-free in the professoriate and with Evolutionary Science preeminent. Exactly how this was done is well covered by MacDonald in his Culture of Critique and other biologically based theorists/scientific studies on race.
The ground had and has been fertilized by White altruism, the only race to have achieved such a genetically based psychological trait.
Whites freed the slaves starting with England ca. 1800 and forward. The rest is history of gentile revolt against Feudalism, in the first place (1789) and Jewish subversion of western anti-feudal and liberal and socialist impulses….read communism.
Arguably, the Jewish Century is about to be ended , with lots of help from the Jews themselves as we see today…right now. Without making great claims about a renaissance of fascism (small f ), we can let a thousand flowers bloom, to coin a phase, and support all forms of nationalism around the world and at home. Everybody in their Natural homes/countries (with obvious exceptions of US and Canada because of the weight of actually existing demography). The Third, or Second world of Latin America with its Indian/White miscegenation can only be left to its fate.
Ending the Jew Power will help rid the White states of muslims, niggers, and illegals of all sorts. This will become an historic battle started at home by Trumpstein, but betrayed of course in his Jew subversion, and greed. As I keep on about, there will be chaos and bloodshed in the Great Removal, but it will happen when Depression and worse happens. Without it, there will just be a Whimper. We need a Bang to awaken White folks. Maybe it is nigh.
(I just noticed in Tim’s remarks on Jared Taylor, that ” it was liberalism , marxism, nihilism” that brought on our racial malaise. Taylor must have forgotten that it was The Jews, since all the Liberalism, marxism, etc. you can enumerate was heavily influenced by you know who…)
1. “The Jews, since ALL…ETC. you can enumerate” overstates their influence, as if other agents were never decisively involved.
2. On Boas, see also: Yotam Harel, “Boas & the metaphysics of race,” Science Direct, October 2025 online; Susan Pollock, “Franz Boas…”, EAZ, January 22, 2024 online; Peter Frost, “Was Franz Boas a race realist?”, Aporia, March 13, 2025.
Who will engineer the Bang? The Almighty Jews as in 1929 or 1939 – and if not them, who? But if so, why? This all needs more thought, not just “jooze-jabber”.
Herr Sellner agrees with Sir Taylor: It was “not external forces” that ideologically and culturally threw the cogs in the machinery of the white race, but liberalism, Marxism, nihilism, consumerism (or other “ideologies” without conrete elaboration).
If one looks past this downright absurd denial of reality, it’s still a reasonably entertaining conversation, even if one really doesn’t learn anything new on their “quest for truth” (and why should one?). https://rumble.com/v7bjhhu-taylor-meets-sellner.html
The Epstein Files revealed the name of a German girl who has been missing for 10 years. https://archive.is/ixOaN She was apparently less fortunate than a certain Junkermann, whom a wacky Brit has become obsessed with. https://archive.is/eSOPM
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhtbhhhIpus_CgX4mJXhF8OhX6Zqo0juQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Junkermann
https://gazetteday.com/nicole-junkermann/
https://nicolejunkermann.substack.com/
https://internewscast.com/news/revealed-german-countesss-link-between-jeffrey-epstein-and-uk-government-uncovered/
I’ve gotten so disgusted with Jared Taylor’s life long refusal to admit that the #1 most dangerous enemy of the White European race is International jewry, that I refuse to watch any of his videos or waste my time listening to any of his podcast appearances.
He is obviously controlled opposition, and now we are seeing that Nick Fuentes has also decided to expose himself for being controlled opposition.
He is even mentioned in the Epstein Files—just once. And guess what the “report” actually says: “Jared Taylor was very careful about not being anti-Semitic. I actually saw him kick a couple anti-Semites out of there. But he was the only one like that.” https://pdfhost.io/v/npghgYbmUn_taylor
@ Luke
You no doubt feel better, as after a nice bath. It won’t make any difference to the world outside your head.
It won’t stop Taylor writing against race mixture, or mixed-race Fuentes incurring the rage of Yitz Goldberg at ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS on June 18 online which is worth reading before your next wash.
Jews. Are. Not. White. They go on and on and on about it in their own spaces.
Like any parasite, they take on the coloration of the host, so European Jews are white-appearing while for instance, Ethiopian Jews are black. The tiny population that’s left of Chinese Jews appear to be, you guessed it, Chinese.
In their Torah it states that Moses himself married a black woman. Color doesn’t matter; what matters is the passing on of the genetic predisposition to parasitism.
Moses and his “mixed multitude” go back 3500 years. Today there are indeed Jews of different coloration, the result of genetic outcrossing (cf. Shlomo Sand) rather than climatic adaptation, over a long period of dispersal. There are three major divisions of Jewry with different average physiognomies. Guenther, Coon, Baker, Lynn, Entine and others still have valid contributions. As you say “what matters is the passing on of a genetic predisposition” – but without diminution, disappearance or recessiveness. Any parasitism may be cultural, unless it can be shown in the DNA, and I don’t know how to find the relevant gene(s) on the chromosome.
PS: “Berber-Jewish modeling scout” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Siad
This article is solid gold (Kasey Kasem voice?)
I’m old enough to remember only 3 TV channels and the local newspaper etc. It was not even thought about that the 3 channels were Jew-owned. They were The TV and if something was said on The TV it was true.
So, naturally I grew up with tons of Holohoax propaganda etc. If it was Jewish, it was Good, and conversely, if it was White, it was Bad. So we had TV shows like Hee-Haw, Gilligan’s Island, All In The Family, yadda yadda that as a main punchline was, “White people are stupid”.
The problem for the Chosenites now is, there are not just 3 TV channels and the local paper. The internet is pretty much everywhere, and even in countries like China that filter out the Jewish stuff like pornography and despair, but keep the good aspects like education, science/tech learning, etc. It’s really hard for a 20-something to be as brainwashed as I was when I was 20.
In a way this harkens back to the days when Uncle Adolf used modern technology (the Germans had tape recorders when the US still only had wire recorders) and between modern tech like that and modern aviation that was not Jew-controlled, was able to get the message out all over Germany.
This is what we need to do, get the message out.
There are very good lectures etc. online about Ford’s “The International Jew” and the Protocols, the Talmud and all the great writers. We are Noticing.
I’m planning a move in a year or so, so I can’t stack up on books right now but I plan on having a good collection once I’m moved and settled in.
Before you recommend The Protocols, at least peruse THE NON-EXISTENT MANUSCRIPT by De Michelis, the textual analysis of its successive versions that Revilo Oliver wanted but never lived to read, though not with a result he would have preferred. This is one lying dog that should be allowed to sleep. There are much better books available.
Cool, now do the successive claims of who the “real” authors were.
When the Protocols first came to light, Great Britain had a global empire, the European West led the world in everything, and there had never been any such thing as a “world war.” The Protocols accurately predicted the coming of WWI, the destruction of Russia through terror and violence, the destruction of Western Civilization through the surreptitious introduction of “liberalism,” the use of “the guns of America” against any nation that resisted Jewish supremacy–i.e., WWII, and the establishment of Israel.
I don’t care if the “real author” of the Protocols was Humpty Dumpty. With that kind of accuracy, the Protocols are worth paying attention to and are more than likely exactly what they claim to be–the Jewish plan for world supremacy.
The advantage to accepting the Protocols at face value is that it gives one a clearer view of the events unfolding around us today–one hundred and twenty-five years after they first surfaced in Russia. For example, in the weeks leading up to the snatching of Maduro in Venezuela, while everyone else was arguing over narco-terrorism, oil reserves, and Marco Rubio’s personal vendetta, I said, based on the Protocols, that US aggression against Venezuela was Israel demonstrating its ability to use US military power to punish world leaders who too forcefully opposed Israel.
https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/the-real-real-reason-the-us-is-fucking
And who was in the situation room with Trump watching Maduro’s arrest and transport to Israel’s western capital, New York City, in real time a couple of weeks later? Benjamin Netanyahu.
I sure agree. The Protocols are too good, too prescient, to be a forgery but then what is a forgery? Is George Orwell’s book “Coming Up For Air” a forgery since it wasn’t a day-to-day clinical accounting of his own life? No, it was based on his life, and on English life in general of the time, and as such is a gem.
Is Geo. Lincoln Rockwell’s hilarious and educational illustrated book about the ducks and the hens a forgery because actual ducks and actual hens don’t act that way?
Are Einstein’s theories forgeries because they were almost certainly actually conceived by the (Gentile) Mileva Maric?
So yes, I agree, who cares? The Protocols are dead-on accurate, eerily so and are ignored at our peril.
As far as that goes, Henry Ford was dead-on. If you have trouble warming up to him, read his “My Life And Work”, written in the 1930s. He’s no Hemingway but it’s an interesting read and will endear him to you. Then dive into all of the issues of his “The International Jew” which again are dead-on. All of this is online, at least for now.
@ Alex
Whoever was responsible for the “Protocols” may I suggest several titles for your collection which WERE unquestionably written by Jews that considerably corroborate your position, but also broaden it with critical correction, extensive information and academic calibre:
(1) Cohn-Sherbok, Dan. “The Paradox of Anti-Semitism” (2007). This notoriously prolific author explains why Jewish leaders bank on hostility.
(2) Finkelstein, Norman. “The Holocaust Industry” (2024 ed). Exposes their massive extortion racket.
(3) Hart, Mitchell (ed). “Jews & Race…1880-1940” (2011). “Images put forth by Jewish writers close to antisemites’.” Strongly recommended. Informative, unusually interesting essays make a valuable intellectual assortment, from anthropology to religion.
(4) Lazare, Bernard (& Robert Wistrich). “Antisemitism: Its history & causes” (1995 ed). Gentiles not to blame. Useful bibliography.
(5) Lindemann, Albert. “Esau’s Tears” (2000). Modern Gentiles not to blame either. Useful annotation.
(6) Muller, Jerry. “Capitalism & the Jews” (2011). Also references Marx.
(7) Romerstein, Herbert & Eric Breindel. “The Venona Secrets” (2000). Unintended exposure of Jewish traitors who spied for Soviet Russia.
(8) Steinweis, Alan. “Studying the Jew” (2008). Third Reich scholarship.
I left out Gerard Menuhin, “Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil” (2026/2017) which comes closest to the neo-NS views often expressed here as he is technically a Mischling and credulously swallowed a PoZ-style fake quote attributed to Menachem Begin, but his bibliography is useful.
The Protocols are weird to say the least.
Surely “guns of China” not America, plus blowing up all the capitals of Europe with underground explosives (bigger than 9/11)?
Actually, it says the guns of America or China, which is ominous in its own right in the event Americans ever develop the courage to stand up to our oppressors that the Germans did.
It says both. Guns of America or China.
If the PoZ were authentic, why are the who, where and when missing from the text?
First, the ‘who, where, and when’ is not a necessary condition for authenticity. If I leave the notes I took in class today on a park bench and you and your friend find them and your friend says, these are definitely Craig’s notes, does it make sense for you to say, if these notes were authentic, why are the ‘who, where, and when’ missing from them?
Second, the ‘who, where, and when’ is not missing from the text anyway.
There is a vast and continuing literature on the subject, but inquirers should not overlook the revealing article by Vadim Skuratovsky, “The Problems of Authorship of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (Kyiv 2001), which is available in translation from Russian online.
The Protocols have occasioned a huge, still flowing literature and had their impact on influential people, from Ford to Franco. I have read some of their defenders including Rosenberg, Bolton and Makow, and recent debunkers like Hagemeister, Baigent and Aaronovitch. I have immediately to hand only the main Marsden translation, but I still cannot see it as a coherent report of serious lectures to important people. They contain Jewish and masonic/secret-society references but in a naive, parodic even clunky form. The document seems to be concocted as an attack on the known Judeo-Masonic collaboration in France at the end of the 19th century and the Franco-Russian gold crisis. Its “accurate predictions” relate to contemporary events (significantly, no mention of Israel) and the advice on techniques of tyranny is traceable to other identifiable texts. However, I have no desire to keep banging my head on the adamantine wall of a bigot’s echo chamber, and leave discussion to others.
By the way, Nesta Webster finally concluded that the PoZ were NOT genuine, according to her secretary Gittens.
All I would add is that any case against Jews and/or Zionists should dispense with this punctured albatross and be formulated independently from the abundant material available over a century later.
Jewish media can avoided by just ignoring it. Jewish “education” can avoided through homeschooling, vocational training, and online courses. But Jewish money cannot be presently avoided. That’s because governments insist on taxing you no matter what you do and the only way to pay taxes is via Jewish fiat.
It is money that is the core of Jewish influence and everything else stems from that. Attack that core, and you will truly begin to heal the infection.
How attack “money that is the core of Jewish influence”?
Alberta’s Social Credit? Hitler’s Third Reich? Mahathir’s Malaysia?
Suggestions welcome.
First off, BDS. Boycott, Divest, etc. Don’t buy Israeli products. Don’t buy from companies that support Israel. Buy locally. Vote for anti-Zionist politicians, or at least the lesser of the evils. TrackAIPAC is useful here. Try to clue others in. Wear a watermelon pin if you feel like. Make little comments; let others know we’re in this together. Be for things that are folkish and against things that are anti-folkish, simple as that.
BDS doesn’t go far enough. We should boycott anything and anyone that threatens the West. Ironically, that also includes Palestinians.
You could try buying gift subscriptions (cheap – $20 for 4 years) of the Michael Journal, a Catholic publication founded for the purpose of promoting Social Credit. HQ are in Montreal, Kanada & I believe there’s an office in the USA, too. You could buy a subscription for yourself and sneak it onto the magazine rack of your public library.
https://www.michaeljournal.org/subscription-boutique/leaflets
https://www.michaeljournal.org
Opponents of Jewish media should not avoid it altogether, but use it as a source of information.
However, like dope and porn and TV individuals can avoid them, but they infect others in the society in which we have to move. Commercialised addiction is not a victimless crime.
Jews are in control, and will remain in control thru myriad devices.
A town (definitely no illegals there) has ‘No ICE’ signs, stickers and instructionals pllastered all over. The capitol is full of sodomy flags, but NO Pali flagd.
They’ll get a race war going,
They conttol every podcaster.
The next pols will be dhabbos Goy, no one doubts that.
And so on.
This is ‘cope’ for the Goyim
@ Frank
“Controlled opposition” is not Jared Taylor, but posts like yours that imply that the jooze have already won and therefore we might all just as well pack up and have chicken soup and bagels for dinner on Friday nights.
Karen, I have known Jared Taylor personally, some. I understand that he is married to a Jew. I read his early books, and followed him on AmRen. He NEVER uses the jew word.
He even placed an article on Latin America by myself…don’t know if it is still up on AM REN.
If he is not controlled opposition, what is he?
Mrs Taylor published a detailed refutation of the allegation about her. Jared wears the trousers at home (unlike many secular-political Jewish households).
You do not have to be Jewish or even philosemitic to reject crazy or childish fantasies about Jews. Taylor controls himself, and has allowed anti-Jewish posts on AMREN.
I am for open debate, but value meticulous documentation and rational argument. We get that with KMac, even if we disagree with some of his opinions, but not with every “jew-hater”.
Karen you’re pretty lunatic on throwing around your Jew Hater hate yourself in its arrogance , usually Jewish in our context.
,
If one is not a jew hater today after all the genocide of the jews, one is just a jew oneself, or a fellow traveller. I hate the Jews and you love the Jews . OK there is no middle ground left after many decades of Jew Hate of Everybody. You are a Jew, and a spy on TOO. Change your name back to Shapiro or whatever.
Bah Wah??
OMFG
🙄
Elon Musk has come out against the White British schoolgirl-raping (for years) Paki/Islamofascist fifth column and the “liberal” Anglo-Zionist fifth column that aided, abeted and enabled it (for years):
Elon Musk calls for trials and executions after a report details the [Anglo-Zionist/Globalist] establishment’s complicity in Pakistani and Islamic rape gang’s systemic abuse of up to 250k White British girls
http://www.judeofascism.com/2026/06/elon-musk-calls-for-trials-and.html?m=1
The Anti-Christ/Beast system is coming under the gun, with the world’s richest man now on board! Pow!
Illegal alien fElon Musk is one of the “randlords” you can look that up, he’s a Chosenite. That’s why the ADL OK’d his Nazi salute, it’s OK when it’s one of their own. He’s also extremely adept as sucking billions of dollars out of the US economy. Of all the nasty diseases I can think of, I think he’s most closely represented by tuberculosis, a disease that causes its victims to waste away in a long, lingering death. Except the victim in this case is the US economy which except for the germ itself and its buddies, looks an awful lot like an emaciated being gasping for life.
Link showing Musk is Jewish?
Musk is doing the anti-Muzzy.
Decades, now, later, the focus suddenly pops up, just as jews were in the spotlight.
Where was the outrage in the 90s?
The 00s?
A: Jews didn’t need it then
@ KMac
Musk told Shapiro that his best friends were Jewish and Elon is Hebrew for oak tree.
BUT IN ANY CASE,
surely f you don’t like someone he/she must be a Jew, a crypto-Jew, a partial Jew, married to a Jew or under Jewish control.
If you don’t like something, the Jews are behind it.
Simples.
You are too clever for your own good, Dr MacDonald, unlike the Jew-Wise who flock to this site like bees to a bluebonnet.
Yep, that’s about it.
Jews are behind everything.
Kars4Kids
You
Can’t
Make
This
Up
The personal abuse here that I am a Jewess in disguise is paranoia on stilts.
More likely dispensers of such crap are sayanim themselves intent on making a realistic blogsite look mad or murderous, and detaching TOO from normal readers and therefore ineffective. Of course, individuals with a personality disorder cannot see this.
I recall a great line from Mark Twain in Tom Sawyer, or Huckleberry Finn, with Nigger Jim and Huck or Tom staring at the heavens one night on the Mississippi barge. Huck/Tom asked Jim if he thought the heavens were made or just happened. Nigger Jim responded, very intelligently that the stars ‘just happened’. Like Herman Melville in Moby Dick, his nigger Quequeg heroically dived into the head of a dead Sperm whale which was hanging on the side of the whale ship, to save the life of a seaman (white) who had fallen into the whale’s oily head. He saved the white seaman.
This is all absurd nigger luv from a couple abolitionist white guys in the 19th century. Melville’s friend and mentor, Hawthorne, must have gotten some belly laughs out of that one…he was very conservative, but like nowadays, kept his mouth shut for fear of the premature jews, white nigger lovers of the time. Abolitionists led the assault on Whites…starting the Civil War which killed about 6 or 7 hundred thousand White men. Just like today, jews and White liberal nigger/beaner lovers are bringing on another catastrophe.
True believer ladies of The Revolution should sign up for the nigger/beaner brigades who will soon be mau-maung White suburbs….oh yeah, right, they already are. White Haters, form up your ranks.
Perhaps off point, but not entirely…I just watched the 1960 movie with the Whitest female actress ever, Audry Hepburn and ditto Whitest male actor, Burt Lancaster, in a totally bizarre Western cowboy and Indian movie, The Unforgiven.
Briefly, hyper White Hepburn is an Indian girl stolen from her tribe and raised by Whites. There is fighting of course for possession of her, ahem, beauty, and lots of folks get killed, mostly Injuns. At one point White girl is confirmed to be Injun, and she wavers in her loyalties, yet is persuaded that she is an Injun, Burt will have none of it and forces her to stay with him and her “white” Family, which accept the Injun girl as one of their own. Aren’t Whites so anti-racist and wonderful?…if they are liberals. You are me and I am you and we are all together
White folks accept the dirty Indian thus striking a blow for racial equality. Such Absurdity thanks to the Jew Hollywood and White Liberal subversion, works for the characters in the movie and the vast goyim audience, The Jews laughing all at the way to the bank and White Disspossession. Gotta love the Jews, they are so democratic and Inclusive. Love them, love them, love them, they are our leaders. If you hate them you are a nazi and what could be worse? Ladies of the Jewish Night, love the niggers, beaners, and muslims. Hate the White haters…more.
180 dirty nazi movies, and unlimited Westerns promoting good injuns and bad whites. Did Jews make all of these white hating movies? Nay, anybody who says this is a dirty nazi, per the ladies of course. Gotta luv the Jews.
@ Joe Webb
Ironically, Hepburn’s parents were dedicated Mosley fascists.
1789 was the bourgeois revolution, in Leftist/communist theory which seems accurate. 1917 was the worker revolution, same left-communist view, more or less true and led by Jews. The nationalist/fascist counter-revolution of the 1930s was the Reaction to the extremist egalitarianism of 1917. The defeat of the 1930s Counter-Revolution , also led by Jews, is still with us, with Jews leading the Third Worldism immigration into the White West, mau-mauing niggers, beaners, and assorted low life from the Third World.
This is where we are today, with another Reaction, of White nationalists in Europe and anglophone countries warming the pot of race hatred to counter the race hatred of niggers and the colored armies of the night. This Reaction by Whites is being tarred by Jews and White liberals with the term, fascist.
This is where we are today. Well, historically, the Jews/liberals are correct, Whites Reacting to their dispossession is national, racial, and is also class struggle against Wall Street, City of London, and assorted bourgeois owners of the means of production (marxist terms of course). Financial Capitalism ( as opposed to Productivist Capitalism) hates workers and middle class Whites. The essentially bourgeois (meaning higher IQ) leaders of the new Third and Second World folks, in Russia, China, and Iran and their followers in the rest of the world, are arguably fascist in their approach to economics and nationalist in their patriotisms.
The West is run by Jews and Financial Capitalist Liberals betraying their White working classes. Fascist, as in National Socialisms , means that ordinary people can have a life with essential sharing of the national wealth. Trumpstein faked his way into political power thru Jew Money and rhetorical theatrics which appealed to middle and working class
folks. He betrayed his maga folks in every way, lower standard of living, allegiance to Israel First, no Wall, and Forever War and fake deportations. He is insane and run by the Jews, even with current shows of disgust with Bibi…all theater to prop up lower gas prices and forestall world depression. We will be back to war as usual soon, with Iran.
World Depression next. Fascist renewal on the horizon if all goes to hell with Jewboy Trumpstein.
Think Col. Macgregor for President in ’28 if the Jews/Trump lets us have a ’28.
I really appreciate and admire Dr. MacDonald’s optimism, but I’m afraid that, even such a “change of elites” takes place, it will be in favour of average whites. In fact one of our shortcomings (as whites) that has been in place for centuries is some disregard for the average white guy or the average low-class guy. Blacks don’t do that. Jews don’t do that. Pakistanies don’t do that. We need to overwhelm them in that regard.
What amazes me is how reactive Jews get when the truth is told about them. ADL and Jon Greenblatt go ape when it’s pointed out how absurdly Anti White they are. Again as usual 0 facts given back but just threats towards Musk. The line to them is ADL stop telling lies about White people, and we will stop telling the truth about you.